Legal Opinion

People v. Couch

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1989No. Docket 101936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. A. Baguley, J.

The prosecutor appeals by leave granted the decision of the Detroit Recorder’s Court that People v Whitty, 96 Mich App 403; 292 NW2d 214 (1980), is controlling in the instant case rather than Tennessee v Garner, 471 US 1; 105 S Ct 1694; 85 L Ed 2d 1 (1985). We reverse.

On October 15, 1986, at approximately 1:10 p.m., defendant was in his office in Warren, Michigan, when he heard a piercing sound, which he recognized as the burglar alarm on his 1986 Cadillac Seville automobile. He left the office building and walked to the parking lot where he saw a man, later identified as Alphonso Tucker,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. ChermanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. KleinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Guider v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API