People v. Couch
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtN. A. Baguley, J.
The prosecutor appeals by leave granted the decision of the Detroit Recorder’s Court that People v Whitty, 96 Mich App 403; 292 NW2d 214 (1980), is controlling in the instant case rather than Tennessee v Garner, 471 US 1; 105 S Ct 1694; 85 L Ed 2d 1 (1985). We reverse.
On October 15, 1986, at approximately 1:10 p.m., defendant was in his office in Warren, Michigan, when he heard a piercing sound, which he recognized as the burglar alarm on his 1986 Cadillac Seville automobile. He left the office building and walked to the parking lot where he saw a man, later identified as Alphonso Tucker,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Commonwealth v. ChermanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. KleinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Guider v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CouchMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990