People v. Couch
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We agree with Justice Archer’s conclusion that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Tennessee v Garner, 471 US 1; 105 S Ct 1694; 85 L Ed 2d 1 (1985), did not "automatically” modify this state’s criminal law with respect to the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing felon. Post, p 441.
As Justice Archer explains, Garner’s pronouncements regarding the constitutionality of the use of such force are inapplicable to private citizens such as the defendant. Regardless of the defendant’s status as a private citizen, however, the prosecution’s argument that Garner applies directly to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. UtterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. ReeseMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. RiddleMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. PinkneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.