State v. Patrick

It is seriously urged that there is no corroborative evidence in this case pointing out appellant as the person who committed the crime. Such evidence is very scant, as will hereinafter appear. Whatever evidence there is 0f a corroborative nature comes from Mrs. Irons, 7 the mother of the girl on whom it is claimed the act was perpetrated.

The alleged crime is said to have been committed at the office of appellant, who is an eye, ear, nose, and throat specialist. Mi’s. Irons went to the office for the girl, and took her home in an automobile. She testifies that the girl complained to her at…