Legal Opinion

Miles v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 18, 1988No. Record 860953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.

The narrow question in this personal injury action is whether the notice to a city of municipal negligence was furnished by the claimant’s “agent” or “representative,” within the meaning of Code § 8.01-222.

As pertinent here, the statute provides:

“No action shall be maintained against any city ... for injury to any person . . . alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the city . . . unless a written statement by the claimant, his agent, attorney or representative of the nature of the claim and of the time and place at which the injury is alleged to have occurred or been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Crewe v. MarlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Heller v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crair v. Brookdale Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Adams v. John & Helen Murphey FoundationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Matter of Marital TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Boyce v. City of WinchesterWinchester County Circuit Court · 1995
  5. Dixon v. City of ChesapeakeChesapeake County Circuit Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API