Legal Opinion

State v. Vaster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1983No. 48571-2PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

Petitioner Maurice Vaster appeals from his convictions for first degree rape and first degree robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions, rejecting petitioner's contention that the inadvertent destruction of a seminal fluid sample violated his due process rights. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Petitioner waived his right to a jury trial and submitted his case to the court on stipulated facts. The trial judge found him guilty of raping and robbing a 19-year-old woman. The crime is described in the trial court's unchallenged findings of fact as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. LaureanoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API