State v. Vaster
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Petitioner Maurice Vaster appeals from his convictions for first degree rape and first degree robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions, rejecting petitioner's contention that the inadvertent destruction of a seminal fluid sample violated his due process rights. We affirm the Court of Appeals.
Petitioner waived his right to a jury trial and submitted his case to the court on stipulated facts. The trial judge found him guilty of raping and robbing a 19-year-old woman. The crime is described in the trial court's unchallenged findings of fact as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LaureanoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.