Legal Opinion
Martin v. Ambach
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, by vacating its reinstatement of the hearing panel’s original findings and recommendations as to charge number three and remitting the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to petitioner Martin against the Commissioner.
Preponderance of the evidence, and not substantial evidence, is the proper standard of proof to be applied by a hearing panel in determining whether disciplinary charges brought pursuant to Education Law…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Gold Fields American Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997
- Young v. Central Square Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Cerminaro v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ellis v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Donato v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.