Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Kovacs

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1931No. 11725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtParr, J.

It is insisted in behalf of plaintiff in error that this was not an injury arising in the course of employment as defined by §1465-68 GC, and by the courts of this state. It iS said that the issue involved here is entirely a question of law except as to the ownership and control of the tent which was not under the control of *249the city of Cleveland and that therefore Kovacs having elected to find shelter in the tent and that the tent and his conduct-in seeking shelter therein had no causal connection with his employment and that-therefore he is not permitted to participate in the State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gale v. Krug Park Amusement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Taylor v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. National Bank of Merrill v. Illinois & Wisconsin Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kemna v. Industrial Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API