Legal Opinion

Yagunchok v. Rutledge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1922No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate, a boy 4 years of age, was struck by an automobile of defendant on a street in Detroit. The injury was fatal. He died within 15 minutes, having, it was said, recovered consciousness momentarily. The declaration counted on both the death act and the survival act. Recovery was had under the survival act. In the count on the survival act it was said:

“And thereby the body of said infant decedent was crushed under the wheels of the said motor vehicle, and thereby grievously and fatally injured from the effects whereof he did die, * * * said infant decedent was violently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKormick v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bosek v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Storrs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Williams v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thompson v. Village of QuincyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Folkerts v. Marysville Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API