Legal Opinion

Alcalde v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2003No. 01-188PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[T1] Diego Olmos Alcalde (Alcalde) appeals his conviction for kidnapping in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 6-2-201(a)(@H1), (b)G) and (c). Alcalde claims error in the substitution of an alternate juror after deliberation had commenced and challenges the constitutionality of the kidnapping statute, § 6-2-201, alleging it is unconstitutionally vague, both facially and as applied in this case. We reject Alcalde's claims that § 6-2-201 is unconstitutional. However, we conclude that the substitution of the alternate juror after deliberations had begun constituted prejudicial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sheesley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Rabuck v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Fraternal Order of Eagles Sheridan Aerie No. 186, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. ForwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API