Legal Opinion

Rabuck v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2006No. 04-194PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Donald Rabuck pled guilty to two counts of taking immodest, immoral, or indecent liberties with a minor, reserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charges. Mr. Ra-buek asserts that the indecent liberties statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Is the indecent liberties statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-105(a) (LexisNexis 2003), unconstitutionally vague as applied to Mr. Rabuck?. FACTS

[¶ 3] Mr. Rabuck was charged with two counts of violating Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-*863105(a) (LexisNexis 2003) 1,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ochoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sanderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Crain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lewis Alan Dugan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API