Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Iheanacho

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 7, 2022No. 3:17-cv-00401-JRUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CITY OF PORTLAND, Case No. 3:17-cv-00401-JR Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CHARLES IHEANACHO and CHERYL D. IHEANACHO, individuals, Defendants. _________________________________ RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff City of Portland (“City”) commenced this action against defendants Charles and Cheryl Iheanacho, alleging defendants failed to report required compliance information in conjunction with a government-administered affordable housing program loan. After settlement negotiations collapsed, defendants filed a partial motion for…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Tworivers v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API