Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stingel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1944No. Appeal, 55PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Opinion by

James, J.,

Appellant was indicted in the language of §513 of the Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS Supp. §4513, which declares: “Whoever......induces, persuades, encourages, inveigles, or entices a female person to become a prostitute;......is guilty of pandering, ......” The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and after dismissing motions for arrest of judgment and for a new trial, the court imposed sentence.

The evidence is undisputed. Appellant, operator of an ice cream and soft drink parlor in the City of Erie, suggested to three young women, respectively 17, 18…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaverySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Ryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Commonwealth v. FideliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. ZampognaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Commonwealth v. PizzarellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Lemoyne Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Commonwealth v. SiliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API