Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Grey

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1909No. Crim. No. 186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PETITION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus, from imprisonment under an ordinance of the city of San Jose. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The petitioner is imprisoned under a complaint charging him with unlawfully practicing the trade of plumbing in the city of San Jose, in the county of Santa Clara, without first having obtained a certificate from the board of plumbing examiners authorizing him so to do, he being a journeyman plumber, contrary to the provisions of an ordinance of said city in relation to plumbing and drainage, a copy of which ordinance is set forth in the petition. ■

It is claimed that the ordinance, in so far as it provides for the appointment of a board of plumbing examiners, and the issuance of a certificate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re DesantaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. People ex rel. Wilshire v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Horwith v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Ex Parte JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Matter of Application of PrenticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API