Peter E. Shapiro, P.A. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Ursula Ungaro, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 54).

THE COURT has considered the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Unless otherwise noted, these facts are undisputed.

I. The Wire Transfer

Plaintiff, Peter E. Shapiro, P.A., is a law firm whose sole principal is Mr. Peter Shapiro.1 D.E. 53, ¶¶ 1-2. The case arises out of a $504,611.13 wire transfer that Plaintiff initiated to an account at…