Legal Opinion

Dean Rubber Manufacturing Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1966No. 17855_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.

Dean Rubber Manufacturing Company, a partnership, was tried to a jury under a ten-count information charging separate violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 331(a). 1 Five counts charged the interstate shipment of “adulterated” prophylactics 2 and five counts charged the interstate shipment of “misbranded” prophylactics. 3

Defendant was convicted on the adulteration counts but acquitted of mis-branding. The prophylactics were labeled “An aid in the prevention of venereal disease,” despite the fact that some were found to have holes.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. 449 Cases, Containing Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Russell W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Robert Allison Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. Ted T. Lynch and Ted H. Lynch v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Aetna Insurance Company v. Getchell Steel Treating Company, Inc., Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd. v. H & L CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API