Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Kay
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1990No. 87 Civ. 6482 (RWS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Georgianna Johnson (“Johnson”) and certain other members of Local 1199, Drug, Hospital and Health Care Employees Union RWDSU AFI^CIO (the “Union” or “1199”) (collectively “Johnson”) have moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants Edward Kay and certain officers of the Union and members of the Executive Council of the Union (collectively the “Executive Council”) have also moved for summary judgment dismissing this action. In addition, Johnson has moved for an award of counsel fees and the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ragin v. Harry MacKlowe Real Estate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- David v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Hollander Glass Tex., Inc. v. Rosen-Paramount Glass Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- New Leadership Committee v. DavidsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.