Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Alicia Leah Gilstrap

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2014No. CR-13-0379-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether a warrant authorizing the search of a home also authorizes police to search a purse found there but belonging to a person not named in the warrant. Under the facts of this ease, we conclude that it does.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Police obtained a warrant to search a Kingman residence for drugs and drug paraphernalia. The warrant also identified two individuals believed to be present. While executing the warrant, police found Alicia Leah Gilstrap, who was not named in the warrant, taking a shower. They escorted Gilstrap to another…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. Frederick M. MicheliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. PettySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay KambitschCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API