Beebe v. Magoun
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — HoN. Wm. Hutch-INSON, Judge. ActioN'to enjoin the collection of taxes levied in payment for the excavation of a ditch. On hearing, the petition was dismissed, and the plaintiffs appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
By proceedings somewhat irregular, but in substantial conformity with sections 1939 to 1951, inclusive, of the Code, a ditch was located, “commencing at or near a clump of trees growing near the center of S. E. ¿ of section 15, Tp. 86, R. 45 west, in Woodbury county, and running thence in a southeast direction to the south line of Woodbury county, at or near the center of the south line of section 35 in said township and range.” From there on, it extended into Monona county. ' Appropriate orders were made by the board of supervisors, the contracts for the excavation let, and, as we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ferry v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Gatch v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Oliver v. Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.