Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Vaughn Diamond
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 2017No. A15-2075PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, TRACY M., Judge
Appellant Matthew Vaughn Diamond appeals his convictions of second-degree burglary, misdemeanor theft, and fourth-degree criminal damage to property following a jury trial. On appeal, Diamond argues his convictions must be reversed because: (1) police seized his property in violation of the Fourth Amendment; (2) the district court violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination by ordering him to provide his fingerprint so police could search his cellphone; and (3) the state’s circumstantial evidence was insufficient. We affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017