Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Geisinger Health Plan

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2023No. 4:20-cv-01236Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAYLEE MCWILLIAMS, individually No. 4:20-CV-01236 and on behalf of all others similarly situated, (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. GEISINGER HEALTH PLAN, and SOCRATES, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION FEBRUARY 8, 2023 Plaintiff Kaylee McWilliams sues Defendants, Geisinger Health Plan (“GHP”) and its subrogation agent, Socrates, Inc., alleging one cause of action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. Defendants now move for summary judgment on McWilliams’ claim. As…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API