Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Darsey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1923No. 3767PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The controlling question in the case is whether a State court, which has appointed a receiver and granted an injunction against one who is subsequently adjudicated a bankrupt, more than four months before such bankruptcy proceedings, can enjoin one from prosecuting his claim in the bankruptcy court as a secured claim on the property in the hands of the receiver of the State court. It is insisted that the court below erred in enjoining A. J. Strickland from prosecuting his claim in the bankruptcy court. In Marshall v. Lockett, 76 Ga. 289, this court held:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fouts v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Murray v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API