Appeal of Bretton Woods Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The petitioners, Bretton Woods Telephone Company, Inc., Dixville Telephone Company, Dunbarton Telephone Company, Inc., and Granite State Telephone, Inc., four exempt incumbent rural local exchange carriers (RLECs), appeal an order of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) denying their motion to rescind or declare null and void registrations of competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) authorized by the PUC to engage in business as telephone utilities in the service territories of RLECs. We affirm.
This appeal follows our decision in Appeal of Union Telephone Co., 160 N.H. 309…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Municipality of GuayanillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Appeal of Northern New England Telephone Operations, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Enhanced Communications of Northern New England, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- New Hampshire Attorney General v. Bass Victory CommitteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Appeal of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource EnergySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Appeal of Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource EnergySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.