Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Attorney General v. Bass Victory Committee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 15, 2014No. 2013-0469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

The New Hampshire Attorney General (AG) appeals an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) dismissing his petition for civil penalties against the Bass Victory Committee (Committee), the authorized campaign committee of former United States Congressman Charles F. Bass, for allegedly violating RSA 664:16-a (2008) (amended 2014) by engaging in “push-polling.” See RSA 664:21, VI (Supp. 2013). The AG argues that the trial court erroneously determined that the Federal Election Campaign Act, 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101 et seq. (FECA), * preempts RSA 664:16-a. We affirm.

I. Background

The following facts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. PelkeySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Cook v. GralikeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Janvey v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  2. Alice Finn v. Ballentine Partners, LLC & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API