Legal Opinion
Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 10, 2008No. Civ. No. 06-091-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Callaway Golf Company (“plaintiff’) filed this action against Acushnet Company (“defendant”) on February 9, 2006, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,506,130 (“the '130 patent”), 6,503,156 (“the '156 patent”), 6,210,293 (“the '293 patent”), and 6,595,873 (“the '873 patent”) (collectively, “the Sullivan patents”). (D.I. 1) Plaintiff alleged that defendant’s Titleist® Pro VI® brand golf balls embody the technology claimed in one or more claims of the asserted patents. (Id. at ¶¶ 17-21) The parties filed motions for summary…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Callaway Golf Co. v. KapposDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- GOLO, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025