Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Leshuk
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 24, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The relevant facts in the present controversy are wholly undisputed. On July 4, 1935, the decedent gave birth to a son. Her assets were meagre, consisting, apparently, only of two unimproved parcels of New Jersey real estate of doubtful value and three policies of insurance upon her life, two of which, in the sums of $250 each, were payable to her husband, and one, of $1,500, was payable to her estate.
*229She appears to have entertained serious misgivings in respect to her recovery, and on July sixth, through the offices of an attorney, executed two documents relating to her temporal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warner v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Flynn v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Baird v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Rogers v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re PrattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Accounting of RothNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946