Legal Opinion

Austin v. Saccacio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for waste, the appeal is from so much of an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, as grants a motion for leave to serve an “ amended and supplemented ” complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. While there is no authority for an “ amended and supplemented” complaint (cf. Horowitz v. Goodman, 112 App. Div. 13; Homer v. Homer, 282 App. Div. 699), the irregularity may be disregarded under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, appellants not having been prejudiced thereby. On the record presented, there was no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Homer v. HomerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MATTER OF GRIDLEY BLDG., INC. v. GingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API