Legal Opinion
Pfizer Inc. v. Lord
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1972No. 71-1580PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners, Pfizer Inc., American Cy-anamid Company, Bristol-Myers Company, Squibb Corporation, and The Upjohn Company, manufacturers of drugs, bring this action, seeking a writ of mandamus pursuant to the All Writs Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and F.R.A.P. Rule 21 directing the Hon. Miles W. Lord, District Judge for the District of Minnesota, to recuse himself from presiding over the above entitled cases. Before instituting this action, petitioners, on September 20, 1971, filed moving papers and affidavits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, asking Judge Lord to disqualify himself for reasons of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.