Legal Opinion

National Bank of Newbury v. Hale

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The action is contract to recover the balance due on three promissory notes signed by the defendant. The de fendant pleaded, and her sole defense was, that she signed the notes in question as surety for her husband and in no other capacity. No replication was filed but the case has been treated thus far as though a reply by way of estoppel had been formally pleaded, and we so treat it. On the facts found by the court below defendant had judgment and the case is here on plaintiff’s exceptions.

While the notes in suit differ somewhat in form, they are treated by the plaintiff as standing alike,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grapes v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. Raleigh County Bank v. PoteetWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Robinson v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. First National Bank v. BertoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Wetmore & Morse Granite Co. v. RyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. Pickett Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Seaboard National Bank v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API