Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Dixon

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by certain defendants from a judgment, and order denying a motion for a new trial, in the Sixth District Court, County of Sacramento. Denson, J. After the decision in Department, the appellant filed his petition that the appeal be reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

This action was commenced against nineteen defendants. It is alleged, among other things in the complaint, that the plaintiff and the defendants are the owners in severalty of a certain tract of land, the boundaries of which, through the lapse of time, the carelessness of occupants, and the absence of natural monuments, have become confused and uncertain. The external lines of the entire tract, and those describing the several subdivisions, of it, have been obliterated, so that no one of the defendants is occupying according to the original boundaries of his claim, which causes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Sierra v. County of NevadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dickey v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Erie Basin Improvement Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API