Legal Opinion

Howes v. Abbott

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1889No. 12880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal frota a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County refusing a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

Application for a writ of mandate. The court below refused to grant the writ, and thereupon this appeal was taken.

The facts are these: The appellant, Howes, was a supervisor, and the respondent, Abbott, was the auditor, of the county of Tuolumne during the year 1887. The board of supervisors of the county held a special session, lasting two days, in June, and a regular session, lasting eight days, in July, of that year. The appellant attended each meeting of the board, and in doing so traveled from his residence to the place of meeting and back, a distance of twelve miles, each…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. BlakelyWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Richards v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API