Legal Opinion

Fraiman v. Abrams

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William H. Keniry, J.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding raises an important issue *201in the area of residential condominium and cooperative conversion law which has not been specifically decided by the courts of New York. That is, whether the Attorney-General under article 23-A of the General Business Law (the Martin Act) must make his affirmative finding that an excessive number of long-term vacancies did not exist in the property to be converted within the time period prescribed in General Business Law § 352-e (2) for the notification to the sponsor of deficiencies in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Council for Owner Occupied Housing, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Eight Cooper Equities v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API