Fraiman v. Abrams
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William H. Keniry, J.
This CPLR article 78 proceeding raises an important issue *201in the area of residential condominium and cooperative conversion law which has not been specifically decided by the courts of New York. That is, whether the Attorney-General under article 23-A of the General Business Law (the Martin Act) must make his affirmative finding that an excessive number of long-term vacancies did not exist in the property to be converted within the time period prescribed in General Business Law § 352-e (2) for the notification to the sponsor of deficiencies in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Council for Owner Occupied Housing, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gonkjur Associates v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Eight Cooper Equities v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.