Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Max Bloom. Because the order appealed from finally determined the proceeding, we do not answer the certified question (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], pp 357-358).
*856We have not previously passed upon the construction of a statute requiring, as did subdivision 2 of section 352-e of the General Business Law, at the time here relevant, that a public official act “not later than thirty days after * * * filing.” We add…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whalen v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by19 opinions
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- King v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of Waldbaum's 122, Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of the City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Janus Petroleum, Inc. v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- City of New York v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.