Legal Opinion

Longtine v. Yeado

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1997No. Civil 970022PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Larry Longtine appealed from an amended judgment modifying his child support obligation to Diana Yeado. We hold the child support guidelines authorize a trial court to consider one-time occurrences in the form of an obligor’s capital gains from the involuntary conversion of a home and profits from an auction sale in setting child support. We affirm.

[¶ 2] Longtine and Yeado were divorced in January 1992. Under a settlement agreement, the divorce decree awarded Longtine the parties’ real estate and farm machinery. 1 The decree also awarded Yeado custody of the parties’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dalin v. DalinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gibbon v. GibbonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Otterson v. OttersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Valley Honey Co., LLC v. GravesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hier v. HiebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API