Longtine v. Yeado
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Larry Longtine appealed from an amended judgment modifying his child support obligation to Diana Yeado. We hold the child support guidelines authorize a trial court to consider one-time occurrences in the form of an obligor’s capital gains from the involuntary conversion of a home and profits from an auction sale in setting child support. We affirm.
[¶ 2] Longtine and Yeado were divorced in January 1992. Under a settlement agreement, the divorce decree awarded Longtine the parties’ real estate and farm machinery. 1 The decree also awarded Yeado custody of the parties’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Dalin v. DalinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Gibbon v. GibbonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Otterson v. OttersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Valley Honey Co., LLC v. GravesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Hier v. HiebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.