Legal Opinion

Byers v. Byers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1930No. 20087PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. An appeal from the court of ordinary is a de novo investigation (Civil Code, 1910, § 5014), and should not be dismissed because of the absence of either party to the cause. “The action may be dismissed for such absence and failure to prosecute the case on the part of the plaintiff, but the appeal can not be dismissed for that reason.” Rousch v. Green, 2 Ga. App. 112 (58 S. E. 313); Singer Mfg. Co. v. Walker, 77 Ga. 649; Davenport v. Puett, 4 Ga. App. 83 (60 S. E. 1031); Dubberly v. Varnedoe, 22 Ga. App. 738 (1) (97 S. E. 261). Thus, where an appeal was regular on its face, and admittedly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Regopoulas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Grogan v. DeraneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Artope v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Rousch v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood v. Delta Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Blevins Aircraft Corporation v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Pipkin v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Curtis v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API