Pipkin v. Garrett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. A motion to set aside a judgment in the city court of Nashville, in which the present case originated, is governed by the same rules of law which would be applicable in a superior court. Ga. L. 1905, p. 314, §§ 17, 23. *6172. Accordingly, as would be true in a superior court, entries appropriately made by tlie presiding judge upon the docket of the city court of Nashville in causes pending in that court “are presumed to represent truthfully the incidents occurring in the course of litigation; and so long as such entries stand unchallenged by direct proceeding to vacate or reform them, they are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walker v. Conn & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Thornton v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Valdosta Guano Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Byers v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Howard v. GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lowery v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932