Legal Opinion

Barnet v. Cannizzaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1957PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action in the City Court of White Plains to recover a broker’s commission from Johannson and Cannizzaro, the alleged vendors of real property (1st cause of action) and to recover damages from the said vendors and Pierson and O’Connor, the brokers who had brought about the sale of the real property, based -on allegations that they conspired to deprive plaintiff of the commission he had allegedly earned (2d cause of action). After trial before the court without a jury, a judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff against Cannizzaro on the first cause of action, in favor of Cannizzaro against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Lee v. City Brewing CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Friedman v. Roseth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Friedman v. Roseth CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Turner v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Kincade v. KincadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Borne Chemical Co. v. DictrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Janowitz Bros. Venture v. 25-30 120th Street Queens Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Healy v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. CV Holdings, LLC v. Artisan Advisors, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API