Legal Opinion

In Re Weibel, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided December 1, 1993No. 19-50227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The law firm of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enerson (the “McCutchen Firm”), whose employment application was denied on the ground that it was not “disinterested” as required by 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), seeks approval of its fees and costs incurred in connection with this ease. For the reasons stated below, its request is denied.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This case was commenced by the filing of a voluntary petition on May 3, 1993. On May 21, 1993, the Debtor filed an application for an order shortening time for hearing on the Debtor’s motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

In the Matter Of: Grabill Corporation, Debtors-Appellees. Appeal Of: Daniel M. PelliccioniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
DeRonde v. Shirley (In Re Shirley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
In Re Rusty Jones, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
In Re Peoples Savings Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
In Re Sky Valley, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (In Re Weibel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
In Re PetersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
In Re Encapsulation International, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998