Charles Lee Thomas v. Donald W. Wyrick and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of State of Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
The central issue in this habeas corpus action is whether a trial court ruling which precluded the testimony of character witnesses for a criminal defendant as a sanction for noncompliance with a pretrial discovery order violated petitioner’s rights under the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court 1 denied petitioner’s requested habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, concluding that the exclusion of character witnesses did not substantially prejudice his case and did not violate his rights…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Juan Baptista-Rodriguez, Ramon Calvo, and Julio R. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- David Polys and Marcia Polys v. Trans-Colorado Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. VandelinderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- Kline v. City of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Sistrunk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.