Legal Opinion

State v. Barckley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 19, 1981No. 80-3644-C, CA 19626PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant was found guilty of Driving While Suspended. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting as evidence certified copies of his driving record, two notices of suspension and two envelopes indicating undelivered certified mail. He admits that his position is contrary to State v. Pingelton, 31 Or App 241, 570 P2d 666 (1977), but argues that Pingelton should be overruled. We affirm.

The disputed evidence objected to consists of copies of a one-page driving record, two suspension orders and two envelopes indicating those orders were sent but undelivered. The driving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PingeltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. EcheverriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. State v. IrvingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. CassadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API