Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Irwin Operating Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 9, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
90 So.2d 460 (1956)
Essie STEINBERG and Louis Steinberg, Appellants,
v.
IRWIN OPERATING CO., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
November 9, 1956.
Warren, Klein & Moore, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Steve M. Watkins, Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, and Roland W. Granat, Miami Beach, for appellee.
THORNAL, Justice.
Appellants Steinberg, plaintiffs below, seek reversal of a summary final judgment in favor of the appellee, Irwin Operating Co., defendant below.
We are called upon to determine whether appellant, Essie Steinberg, was an invitee or a licensee on the premises…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Boca Raton v. MattefSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Freeman v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Williams v. MayerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Eisen v. Sportogs, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Noyes v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doe v. Jameson Inn, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Smith v. Cedar Rapids Country ClubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Reichenbach v. Days Inn of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Cathleen Meyers v. Ramada Hotel Operating Company, Inc., a Corporation, Tolbert Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Esser v. McIntyreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.