Eisen v. Sportogs, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appellants, husband and wife, lost in their action against the appellee to recover damages suffered when the wife stumbled and fell in the store of the appellee, a so-called “one man” corporation dominated, operated and controlled by appellants’ son.
The salient facts are simple. Evidently the appellee’s place of business consisted of a shop where shirts were made and a store where the products of the shop were sold. The appellant-husband had taken to his *45home some shirts “in embryo-” for the purpose of working on them in the evening. The next morning he forgot to take them…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Napier v. First Congregational Church of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Freeman v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steinberg v. Irwin Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Bullard ex rel. Bullard v. Robin Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Seigle v. HagemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961