Legal Opinion

Poling v. Melee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 17, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Campbell, Chancellor.

This is an appeal from judgments in favor of the plaintiffs below entered upon verdicts in their favor, the amount of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff Eussell Poling having been reduced upon a rule for new trial and the judgment in his favor being for such reduced amount.

It is not necessary to state the proofs in any great detail. The action was for damages for injuries to Mrs. Poling, and the resulting damage to her husband, occasioned by her coming in contact with the motor car driven by the defendant upon a public highway…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Colburn v. FrostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
  5. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API