Legal Opinion

Ross v. Van Dyke

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1919No. S. F. No. 8776Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Wm. S. Wells, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of court upon verdict of a jury in favor of proponents in a contest of the will of Isaac J. Ross, deceased.

There was a former appeal, in which this court reversed a judgment entered aftér the sustaining of a motion for non-suit. (Estate of Ross, 173 Cal. 178, [159 Pac. 603].) At the second trial the contestants introduced virtually the same testimony as that produced" upon the previous hearing, and, as a summary thereof was given by Mr. Justice Henshaw in the opinion which appears in the one hundred seventy-third volume of the California Reports, we refer to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Medlin v. SpazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Ergo v. Merced Falls Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Campbell v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dyke v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API