Legal Opinion

Klein v. Hines

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 23, 1941No. 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLY, District Judge.

I must hold that there has been no service of process on defendant Hines. His official residence is not in this District *650and he could not be served here. Nesbitt Fruit Products v. Wallace, D.C., 17 F. Supp. 141, Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., v. Farley, 2 Cir., 71 F.2d 288, Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44, 72, 42 S.Ct. 453, 66 L.Ed. 822. Further, no copy of the summons was delivered to him here or elsewhere. It appears from the return of the Marshal that a copy of the summons and complaint were left at the office of the District Attorney of the United States for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  5. Barnett v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Rivera v. CancelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  3. Federal Landlords Committee, Inc. v. WoodsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Declet v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1955
  5. Mission Beverage Co. v. PorterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API