Matter of Frick
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Respondent contends in her first assignment of error, based on Exceptions nos. 1,2, and 3, that Findings of Fact nos. 7, 8, and 18 are not supported by the evidence. We disagree. At the hearing, respondent testified:
I’m talking about staying with people that I’ve met. Some of these are men. But in my book you have to accept charity where charity is offered. And if you can handle the situation, I feel like. I meet these men at the lounge. No, no I don’t go for stuff like that but it’s better than, if my car is in Albemarle, I was forced to do this.
Respondent further testified…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Matter of HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993