Legal Opinion

Matter of Frick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1980No. 8010DC445PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Respondent contends in her first assignment of error, based on Exceptions nos. 1,2, and 3, that Findings of Fact nos. 7, 8, and 18 are not supported by the evidence. We disagree. At the hearing, respondent testified:

I’m talking about staying with people that I’ve met. Some of these are men. But in my book you have to accept charity where charity is offered. And if you can handle the situation, I feel like. I meet these men at the lounge. No, no I don’t go for stuff like that but it’s better than, if my car is in Albemarle, I was forced to do this.

Respondent further testified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Matter of HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API