American Cyanamid Co. v. Ring
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. Enumerations 2, 6,10 and 11 complain of rulings of the trial court relating to the jury finding that the couple was married at the time of the husband’s death. This is based on evidence supporting instructions of the trial judge relating to a common law marriage preceding the July 10 death and following a divorce entered between the parties on March 6,1975, based on a petition filed by the husband, service of which was acknowledged by the wife on January 27,1975. The couple had separated in November but were living in the same house by the end of the year. There is a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drawdy v. HestersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Peacock v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Rolan v. RittenhouseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Stafford Enterprises, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- American Cyanamid Co. v. RingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Stafford Enterprises, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982