CHARLES LAUB, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Charles Laub (“Movant”) appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion alleging ineffective assistance of courisel. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel failed to present Movant’s requested impeachment evidence against two State’s witnesses. Finding no merit in Movant’s claim, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background 2

At the time of the events leading to his conviction, Movant had been in an intimate relationship with Victim…