Legal Opinion

Ragland v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1954No. 7 Div. 268PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of robbery.

The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge, neither did he file a motion for a new trial.

In this state of the record the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment below is not presented for our review. Holmes v. State, 35 Ala.App. 585, 50 So.2d 800; Corbitt v. State, 35 Ala.App. 572, 50 So.2d 454.

We will not laden this opinion with any delineation of the evidence.

There was some evidence that the appellant contemplated and attempted flight. Pertinent to this inquiry the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dennison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Myhand v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Snead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Dodd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Gilbert v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Honeycutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API