Ragland v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of robbery.
The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge, neither did he file a motion for a new trial.
In this state of the record the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment below is not presented for our review. Holmes v. State, 35 Ala.App. 585, 50 So.2d 800; Corbitt v. State, 35 Ala.App. 572, 50 So.2d 454.
We will not laden this opinion with any delineation of the evidence.
There was some evidence that the appellant contemplated and attempted flight. Pertinent to this inquiry the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dennison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Myhand v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Snead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Dodd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- Gilbert v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Honeycutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955