Legal Opinion
Lusk v. Ryder Integrated Logistics
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2001No. 99-6297PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Louis Ray Lusk has a forty pound permanent lifting restriction due to a heart condition. He filed a complaint against his former employer, Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, alleging disability discrimination under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101-12213, and wrongful discharge under the Oklahoma’s Workers’ Compensation Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 85, §§ 5-6. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendant on the ADA claim, see Fed. R.Civ.P. 56, holding that Plaintiff failed to submit evidence creating a genuine issue of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hubert Wooten v. Farmland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Ruiz Rivera v. PEIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hallahan v. the Courier JournalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Rakity v. Dillon Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Justice v. Crown Cork and Seal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.