Legal Opinion
Rakity v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2002No. 01-1484PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Charles L. Rakity, a grocery clerk at King Soopers, sued his employer, arguing the supermarket chain’s failure to promote him violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. After determining Mr. Rakity did not have a covered “disability” under 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2), the district court granted King Soopers’ summary judgment motion. On appeal, Mr. Rakity argues summary judgment was inappropriate because (1) material evidence indicates Mr. Rakity has “a record of’ and was “regarded” by King Soopers as having an impairment that substantially limits one or more of his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Ronald J. Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf of TheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Hallahan v. the Courier JournalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Ramos-Echevarria v. Pichis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.